The promise
This assessment gives you a clear picture of what your position rests on, what the other side is likely to argue, what evidence would matter if the matter progressed, and what a proportionate outcome could realistically look like — all in writing, within two weeks.
The problem
An unpaid invoice, a contested delivery, or a disagreement over the scope of work performed can sit unresolved for weeks while it is unclear whether pursuing it further is worthwhile. Without an outside view, it is easy to either let a legitimate claim lapse or spend more chasing it than it is worth.
The solution
Correspondence and contracts are reviewed against the facts as you describe them, and set alongside the response the other party would likely give. The result is a written picture of the dispute as it stands, not as either side would prefer it to look.
The experience
Your side of the channel
You send the relevant correspondence and contracts, along with a plain account of what happened. No particular format is required.
This office's side
The material is reviewed, the counter-position is worked out, and a written note of options and their likely cost is returned within two weeks.
The investment
¥24,000
This covers review of correspondence and contracts for one dispute, and a written note of options and their likely cost, returned within two weeks.
The proof
The assessment is grounded in the documents provided and in ordinary practice at the summary courts, rather than in general reassurance. Where pursuing a matter would likely cost more than it recovers, that conclusion is stated plainly rather than softened.
The assurance
There is no obligation to proceed further after receiving the assessment. It is intended to inform your decision, not to commit you to any next step.
Next steps
Send a message with a general description of the disagreement, and the documents can be arranged from there. There is no need to have everything organised in advance.